Saw the Rabbids before, but damn that was so unexpected haha.
Yeees better imposters. I’m waiting for the hole in my stomach to go away.
Seeing VRC+ exposed to udon is cool and all, but what about exposing 18+ status as well? giving creators ability to lock rooms/objects behind age verification? or locking the whole worlds if they might be innapropriate?
I was looking for this while working on my world and wanting to include an NSFW image, but not wanting for it to be visible to underage ppl.
3 Likes
We really want VRC on MacOS guys!
PRESENTING AN EASY FIX:
-
Open App Store Connect
-
Select VRChat for iOS
-
Navigate to the TestFlight tab
-
For each group selected in the sidebar, under Test iPhone and iPad apps on Macs with Apple silicon click Enable
Per instructions here: Test iPhone and iPad apps on Macs with Apple silicon - Test a beta version - App Store Connect - Help - Apple Developer
Source: Apple Silicon Mac Support | Voters | VRChat
This would only be for the time being whilst you work on an official port.
With more ways to obtain items now, such as VRC+ and bundles, the number of items I own has increased, and they no longer fit within the current wheel. I would like to request an increase in the number of item slots.
The current plan is to allow rays from VRCRaycast to hit worlds, hit players, or hit both at once, via built-in sets of layers representing worlds and players. Raycasting against contacts isn’t viable at the moment because they aren’t Unity colliders.
2 Likes
“Exposing VRC+ Status to udon” will world creators get rewards for VRC+ users joining the world? personally if there isn’t really something to provide incentive to the creator i don’t think i would implement it in any of the worlds i make
1 Like
so selective activation’s going to be a bit difficult 
I mean I understand that the contacts aren’t your typical collider, but if they were to be assigned to Player + PlayerLocal layers it’d be helpful for those that would wanna replicate that behavior without finding the player capsule if the player’s model is, for example, using gogo loco to go up or down in their height. Only question is if we could make the VRCRaycast choose if it’d hit either Player/PlayerLocal or both
The only reason vrchat hasn’t been abandon by most of the player base is because age verification ie giving your personal info and government documents to a third party known for failure and data breach’s. is that it is optional. No they are not going to force age verification to even enter a world by default. Take your coded message elsewhere. VRchat is not going to become age verification only. There are good reasons not to give your documents to Persona. enough
im not sure what you understood from my post, im just asking for a way to detect if a player has the age verified tag using udon, creating blacklists in worlds is against vrchat tos so you wont be kept outisde of your worlds, but it would be useful to hide specific content within a map. Having access to content filter tags within udon will also be great to have
1 Like
In regards to the VRC+ to Udon, im not sure if this will be taken the way its intended for the developers out there. As a developer myself in other areas, I look at how does this benefit the world makers at all? Theres already benefits in a form of single purchase virtual items that players can purchase for their own worlds that give them special features, privileges, or even just tags. Im not sure if this particular approach with VRC+ is very encouraging to use. Maybe help me change my mind on this, so here’s my thought process: Oh, look, you are a VRC+ subscriber. Since you are paying money to support VRChat, let me give you special stuff in my world that I worked very hard for doing that. I dont take part in you supporting vrc+, so im just gonna give you even more free stuff, without you really helping me. Also, VRChat doesnt really support me in the VRC+, so use these bonus features in my world at your leisure.
All in all, I do like the concept of this idea, and it would be nice to see in official VRChat Sponsored worlds, but in private user-made worlds like Fish? Meh.
2 Likes
But why
Yeah, all in all.. Exposing VRC+ Status is kind of useless IMO. It’s not our subscription service after all. Not sure why I would participate in free advertising especially with all of the FOMO VRC+ has with its seasonal drops.
I really hope we get an option for manual layers as wel to allow for workarounds in older worlds were objects may not be on the layers you expect. or to purposely exclude certain layers for unique game world interactions with custom avatars.
2 Likes
I’m also hoping for an ‘advanced’ toggle that lets us pick and choose the layers.
No such luck, sadly.
Another useful feature would be age verification (Udon query) for the worlds, e.g., for club worlds.
1 Like
Okay so in the initial post they do ask for ideas in the comments. But lets set that aside for a minute, I think any creator can get some use out of this feature. Like maybe one of the following:
- Have a little message somewhere that only shows for VRC+ users that just mentions touching grass
- Message that says VRC+ is cringe
- If you have any way to support you mentioned in world, I’m not sure exactly but “Hey you support VRChat, why not support me as well” came to mind.
- Add an easter egg that requires a non-VRC+ supporting user to have been in an instance to trigger
- Or basically you could reward non subscribers in a very silly way
Also for this statement, I feel that it would be justified to have a FinalIK replacement in the long term, given that not a lot of people could afford to get a copy of it, and it’d offer more performant options that would translate over to mobile/quest users of VRChat. Anything that becomes quest friendly is beneficial to us PC users
Please do not share a date. Please. 
Don’t get people’s hopes up again. Just surprise us.
I’ve given up on them being fixed, so I’ve been using VRCVideoCacher. Made by some of the same people who make VRCX.
I also believe the YT Search world works, since it uses its own proxy to load urls.
As a consequence, you now have a full FFmpeg dependency (larger attack surface) from the upstream yt-dlp executable and several (less safe) command line options available, such as --netrc-cmdand --exec for command execution, which have been removed from VRChat’s yt-dlp fork, among most options and configuration removed.
The following yt-dlp-ejs issue is still unresolved, so using VRCVideoCacher at this time with yt-dlp 2026.03.03 may not even resolve YouTube playback issues: Recent players failing on all variants · Issue #51 · yt-dlp/ejs
To echo tupper from the VRChat Community Team, I can’t recommend to actually use VRCVideoCacher to be safe. https://ask.vrchat.com/t/video-players-having-issues/34472/13