Instructions are within. Send a request to https://vrch.at/support if you want to remove your age verification status or your birthdate on VRChat.
You’ll have to contact Persona if this is about LinkedIn or Reusable Persona in their capacity as a data controller. If your request is about age verification on VRChat, then Persona is acting as a processor on behalf of VRChat and Persona does not store your personal data (unless instructed by VRChat, which does not seem to be the case here).
Can you share with us the legal agreement that you have with Persona? Otherwise I don’t know if people can really trust the extent to which Persona is being truthful to you. You may be honest about what Persona told you, but how can we trust that Persona is being truthful about what they tell the VRChat team?
The reason I say this is because of this:
I bring this up for one primary reason.
It is not because, for this government software that was made, they do 269 separate checks and basically create an entire profile on exactly who you are (and tie it to whatever service you’re verifying with).
It’s because a vendor working with Persona managed to make one of the most insecure pieces of software on the planet, especially one that was verified to be secure for government activities, when it was clearly not.
The fact that Persona, the primary entity here responsible for the security of their own data, somehow allowed this to happen? How can we trust Persona? Why weren’t they more tightly integrated with the process of this software being made, when it uses their systems?
I’ve been around corporate software before. I know the intense legal agreements that usually happen when data sharing becomes a thing. So how is this even allowed to happen in the first place? Why would they let a development build into the wild that interacts with Persona data? What if private keys were exposed to access Persona data?